Discuss » Current Issues

NWA Taliban pledge adherence to peace accord

(23 posts)

  1. Mirza Ghalib
    member

    NWA Taliban pledge adherence to accord

    Thursday, March 18, 2010
    By Malik Mumtaz Khan

    MIRAMSHAH: After weeks of tense calm in volatile North Waziristan Agency (NWA), the Taliban on Wednesday announced to honour their peace accord with the government.

    The Taliban, led by Hafiz Gul Bahadur, issued a leaflet in Urdu language, pledging to abide by the peace accord. “We will keep our peace accord intact for the sake of our people and all the Muslims,” the Taliban explained in the leaflet.

    They denied any role in the recent strong-worded leaflets issued by some elements in North Waziristan against the government and the military authorities, accusing them of working for the interest of the US in the region. They also distanced themselves from remote-controlled bomb attacks on security forces in tribal region and termed them an act of the enemies of the North Waziristan residents.

    The Taliban said they had nothing to do with the people who circulated leaflets in the area a few days ago, and challenged the perpetrators to disclose their names. They said they did not issue any leaflet without approval of their Shura or council.

    Some unknown people had circulated the leaflets, accusing the military authorities of selling innocent Pakistanis like Dr Aafia Siddiqui to the US for dollars. It had alleged that security agencies were involved in the killing of innocent Pakistanis for dollars and were creating hurdles in the way of implementing Shariah in the country.

    http://www.thenews.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=229661

    Posted 1 year ago on 18 Mar 2010 7:29 #

  2. hariskhan
    member

    Assalam-o-Alaikum-Warahmat-ULLAH ALL,

    Yaar, of-course. Its a matter of common sense.

    (1) Who wants peace there ?
    Answer: The people of that region

    (2) Who doesn't want peace ?
    Answer:

    #1: USA/Nato, Israel, India
    #2: Pakistan Army
    #3: Pakistan Govt.

    (3) Who has interest in continuation of this war ?
    Answer:
    #1: USA/Nato, Israel, India
    #2: Pakistan Army
    #3: Pakistan Govt.

    (4) Who is paying money to Pakistan Govt. + Pakistan Army to continue waging this war endlessly ?

    Answer: #1: USA/Nato (Israel)

    To phir common sense kya kehti hai ?

    Posted 1 year ago on 18 Mar 2010 7:37 #

  3. achtung
    Member

    hafiz gul bahadur ka jazba khush aiend hy

    haris behai.

    kia baa hy aapki. khood he sawal kartey ho aur khood he jawab de detey ho.

    aala

    Posted 1 year ago on 18 Mar 2010 7:45 #

  4. hariskhan
    member

    Assalam-o-Alaikum-Warahmat-ULLAH ALL,

    @achtung: Mere oopar ilzam lagane ke ilava koee aur kaam ata hai ?

    Main apna comment likh raha hoon, aap apna lihko. Mere peechHe kyoon parh gae ho ?

    Posted 1 year ago on 18 Mar 2010 8:04 #

  5. achtung
    Member

    harris. mei to aap ki tareef kar raha tha ! acha ainda nahee karoo ga. shukriya

    Posted 1 year ago on 18 Mar 2010 8:10 #

  6. Wahid Doyum
    Member

    @Harishkhan, you missed the part where Hafiz Gul Bahadur gets paid by Pakistani Army (with US money) to keep the "peace" deal.

    Posted 1 year ago on 18 Mar 2010 22:09 #

  7. hariskhan
    member

    Assalam-o-Alaikum-Warahmat-ULLAH ALL,

    @Wahid Doyum: You don't strike me as a person belonging to FATA areas or from Pashtoon. If you were, you wouldn't bring this up. You would have known their way of going about matters.

    This exposes you again.

    Who are you ? What are your objectives ?

    Posted 1 year ago on 19 Mar 2010 4:16 #

  8. skunk
    Member

    They are lying b******. We all remember too well when government agreed to Shariah implementation in Swat, Sufi Muhammad and Fazlullah moved into Buner the very next day and declared everything unconstitutional the next Friday. They are only making this offer to buy time to regroup. We should crush them and show no mercy what so ever.

    Posted 1 year ago on 19 Mar 2010 5:02 #

  9. skunk
    Member

    Cut the crap, we all saw what happened on the 14th August after Pakistan regained Swat. Almost the entire population was rejoicing on streets. Even then these Jamatis, Imran Khan, N League and Shahid Masood were giving the same crap of people wanting Taliban. Aaj Taliban ka naam suna bhi pasand nahi kerte Swat ke loag.

    Posted 1 year ago on 19 Mar 2010 5:05 #

  10. hariskhan
    member

    Assalam-o-Alaikum-Warahmat-ULLAH ALL,

    @skunk: O I guess;

    (1) that 10 weeks of peace (which was broken off by Govt./Army of Pakistan on behest of USA)

    (2) Gen. Orakzai confirming that Govt./Army of Pakistan broke ALL pacts/deals on behest of USA

    was nonsense, huh ?

    Swat ke loago'n ki sun kon raha hai ? How do you know what people of Swat are saying ?

    Don't give me BS!. I'll throw it back on your face.

    Posted 1 year ago on 19 Mar 2010 5:21 #

  11. junaid
    Member

    yeah totally agreed with haris. it was amrika who pushed the govt to break the treaty. even though if they were to migrated buner, they could have handled it in the qazi courts. i was watching this clip on buner people, they were happy with swati's arrival. why did army initiate the operation even without telling the govt. it surely depicts who weaken this democratic setup has had been. gul bahadar group has been always with army so i dont think if its a new news.

    Posted 1 year ago on 19 Mar 2010 7:03 #

  12. Wahid Doyum
    Member

    @hariskhan,

    I have just exposed gul bahadur khan's alliance with army against pukhtuns, and trust me I know more about the situation then you ever will in your whole life. You can go ahead and follow your leader who's only job is to blame blackwater for what are in fact ISI/Taliban game plan to destroy Pukhtuns.

    Posted 1 year ago on 19 Mar 2010 15:39 #

  13. Wahid Doyum
    Member

    The swat "peace" deal was signed while taliban suicide bombers were present at the signing. It was not a peace deal, but a deal of surrender for swatis.

    Junaid, I am sure you do not know even one Sawati, let along how much hate they have for army and their taliban allies.

    Posted 1 year ago on 19 Mar 2010 15:41 #

  14. skunk
    Member

    @ junaid/haris:

    once they stepped into Buner the treaty stood broken, these are are lying b***** who should be fought to the hilt. Army launched operation with governments permission and government was quite tormented a lot in the media for starting operation.

    As for who asked Swat ke loag? The 14 August celebrations were quite self evident, moreover, not far away in Mansehra anti operation PMLN lost its seat, in Swat ANP has retained all its seats in bye elections.

    Posted 1 year ago on 19 Mar 2010 20:30 #

  15. skunk
    Member

    @ wahid doyum: They will lie in your face that they have met Swatio who happen to like Talibans glorious rule, when even I personally knowing a lot of Swatis know that it is not true. Even those who supported Fazlullah at first have regretted ever supporting him.

    Posted 1 year ago on 19 Mar 2010 20:32 #

  16. hariskhan
    member

    Assalam-o-Alaikum-Warahmat-ULLAH ALL,

    You'r telling me to believe in results of by-polls ?

    How many times do you want me to;

    (1) prove to you that by-polls were rigged for favourable outcomes for those who were already in power ?

    (2) tell you, a lot less number of people participated in by-polls

    before you'll stop throwing this crap at me ?

    Posted 1 year ago on 19 Mar 2010 22:06 #

  17. skunk
    Member

    General elections ka boycott kerte hain, har subay mein zamanat zabt hoti hai inki aur aamiron ki hukumat na ho tou kabhie seat nahi jeetay yeh jamati aur doosron ko kehte hain ke awam tumharay saath nahi?

    Popular hoti tou election jeeti hoti, har baar hartay hain aur phir rigging ka raag alaapnay lagtay hain.

    Stop throwing this crap at me!

    Posted 1 year ago on 19 Mar 2010 23:04 #

  18. hariskhan
    member

    Assalam-o-Alaikum-Warahmat-ULLAH ALL,

    We have accepted our defeat. That is not the issue.

    The issue I raised is the validity of elections. Why are you running away from this point ?

    Posted 1 year ago on 19 Mar 2010 23:09 #

  19. skunk
    Member

    As far as elections validity is concerned, validity means legality, which is not disputable. However, if you are questioning whether it was representative of the population then I'll say that the defeat of Jamaat i Islami was so resounding that there is no possible way that it could have been done through rigging, eg you lost Pindi by 60,000 votes, Lahore by 30,000 and Jhang, Fort Abbas and Jafarabad as well while not fielding candidates for Jacobabad.

    The people have given their verdict, even Shaikh Rasheed is better than Munawar Hasan according to them.

    Posted 1 year ago on 19 Mar 2010 23:17 #

  20. hariskhan
    member

    Assalam-o-Alaikum-Warahmat-ULLAH ALL,

    I have already accepted the fact that we lost by-polls, even if they were rigged.

    Yet, you seem to be on edge. You seem to be suffering from insecurity. Why ?

    This thread is about Taliban. Not about by-polls. Let's stick to the topic at hand.

    Posted 1 year ago on 19 Mar 2010 23:54 #

  21. Wahid Doyum
    Member

    The thread is about how Pukhtuns from the beginning have rejected the reactionary mullah based so called religious parties and have fought for Islam AND Pukhtun tradition, but never disregarded Pukhtun tradition in history before like it being done today.

    Taliban have been imposed on Pukhtuns by treachery, guile and great games by those east of the Abaseen. When it suits mullah gangs, they will say that blackwater is behind terrorism, but in the same sentence they will say that terrorism will end if Pukhtuns surrender their lands, homes and women to Taliban. Such munafiqat from Jamaat has broken all previous records.

    One more proof of how outsiders are trying to push Pukhtuns into endless war for their own gain.


    Uzbek group to ‘free Pakistan from US control’

    MIRANSHAH: The Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU) vowed on Thursday they would “free Pakistan from the American clutches” and continue jihad for the enforcement of sharia law in the country. The message was released through pamphlets distributed in North Waziristan’s Miranshah town, marking six years of the first-ever coordinated attack by security forces on their hideout near Wana in South Waziristan on March 16, 2004. The IMU is led by Uzbek terrorist Tahir Yuldashev who survived a Frontier
    Corps attack in Kaloosha region of South Waziristan. The terrorists thwarted the attack and inflicted huge losses
    to the FC. staff report

    http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=20103\19\story_19-3-2010_pg1_6

    Posted 1 year ago on 20 Mar 2010 2:39 #

  22. junaid
    Member

    at skunk
    @ junaid/haris:

    once they stepped into Buner the treaty stood broken, these are are lying b***** who should be fought to the hilt. Army launched operation with governments permission and government was quite tormented a lot in the media for starting operation. //quote

    time shall tell that who will approach the hilt. whether the na pak army aur the freedom fighters. i wont abuse your na pak army here cause i think i should make a difference here. why dont army let the media go to swat; they know the moment independent media goes there the false poll patian of firqa wariyat army would be exposed. actually they fighters havent started fighting with the sellouts. they still think that they are hamaray bhai jin ko maro nahi wait karo.
    there was maulana diesel and many politicians already spoke to media about how they were told that operation was already initiated. recently i saw saad rafiq on some duna news program saying that we were told by the military unlike we gave any orders.
    @ Wahid Doyum

    you can only guess about my knowings. I have spent years with swatis.

    Posted 1 year ago on 20 Mar 2010 6:36 #

  23. Wahid Doyum
    Member

    @junaid, I have doubt that you have spent years anywhere outside of a northern punjab city.

    Posted 1 year ago on 21 Mar 2010 3:38 #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.